Archive for July, 2009

Drivers don’t trust reasons for road tax

Very interesting article based around the results of a select commons commitee.

Public trust needs to be rebuilt in the wake of a lack of faith in how road tax is spent, according to a transport select committee report out today.

The committee said the government “must improve the way in which it justifies taxes on road users to rebuild public trust”.

MPs warned road investment should be justified only on wider transport objectives, need and benefits. In a statement they said they: “Reject the notion of hypothecation for transport taxes, arguing it provides a poor basis for public expenditure decisions and ignores the social costs associated with road use-policing, accidents, pollution and carbon emissions.”

They also said there was a “case for earmarking revenue from specific local schemes for spending in a given geographical area when such an approach will earn public acceptability and help ensure fairness”.

Committee chairman Louise Ellman MP said: “The government handled a phased set of increases to vehicle excise duty so badly they tarnished the image of environmental taxes.

“We believe taxation based on car usage-through fuel duty-remains fairer than any approach based on car ownership and does more to encourage fuel efficiency or reduce CO2 emissions.

“We recognise that economic factors will limit how much revenue can be raised by this method. We call on the government to develop other measures to address the problem of congestion.”

via Drivers don’t trust reasons for road tax|inthenews.co.uk.

At last there seems to be some recognition that the Road Transport industry is both heavily legislated and seen as a cash cow to the government.

Last year I wrote on my blog about the changes in revenue for the Dartford Crossing (QEII bridge). That the revenue poured straight into the governments coffers and nothing was set aside for the local area where the effects of the traffic are felt. It seems slowly the public are waking up to the fact that the UK transport industry funds a lot of things not related to transport.

When the environmental figures are bandied about the pollutive effects of the Motor Industry is quoted from 15 to 25% of emissions, yet the revenue generated from so called environmental road tax is far higher and certainly not in proportion.

It’s nice to see a report that outlines the green washing by the Government and feels that people have had enough of it. Lets hope they have had enough to the point that something will be done thats fairer and supportive of our courier and transport industry, after all they deliver the goods to your doorstep…

Sarah

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

, , , , , , ,

1 Comment

New tool to manage ‘grey’ fleet use

An interesting article from which below is an extract regarding ‘Grey mileage’ and tracking it. The Kit mentioned below has been launched by Enterprise Rent a Car, and the kit is free.

The company says that its new Driving the Right Behaviour pack includes a tool which promises to measure the ‘grey’ fleet, something that has been notoriously difficult to quantify. As a result, its impact can be greatly reduced through a solid decision making process.

The ‘grey’ fleet is a widely used transport option for many organisations, especially in the public sector. It’s estimated that 57% of all public sector miles are ‘grey’ fleet journeys, equating to around 1.4 billion miles every year.

The pack includes best practice advice, a transport policy template and a ‘grey’ fleet toolkit, equipping fleet decision makers with all the tools necessary to measure and better manage the ‘grey’ fleet.

At the centre of the pack is a tool which brings in information from a variety of sources in a way that can help measure the impact of the ‘grey’ fleet, including quantifying its impact on costs and emission profiles

via Enterprise launches new tool to manage ‘grey’ fleet use.

If you would like a free Driving the Right Behaviour pack contact Oz Choudhari on Oz.Choudhri@erac.com.

Sarah

Couriers on twitter? add yourself here!

, , ,

No Comments

Racing Green – Electric and Hybrid Supercars – The Naked Scientists June 2009

If podcasts are your thing, and less face it they are good to listen to whilst driving, then this one may be right up your street if you like Green and Science.

It’s part of a series of podcasts relating to driving in the future.

Please click the link and read it if you don’t fancy listening to it.

Sarah

via Racing Green – Electric and Hybrid Supercars – The Naked Scientists June 2009.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

, , , , , ,

No Comments

UK orders white van man study

This snippet came via a twitter buddy @UKDivorce, thanks Jackie for the link.

A study to increase knowledge of the rapidly growing “white van man” sector on UK roads has been commissioned by the government.

There are three million light commercial vehicles (LCV) on the road, marking a 40% rise in 10 years.

There is a lack of knowledge about this sector “often unloved by motorists, pedestrians and regulators”, said the Commission for Integrated Transport.

The study is the first attempt to get to grips with this “complex area”.

“The study will also plug some major gaps in our knowledge of this flexible business tool so that policymakers in both Westminster and Brussels can make informed decisions without harming the vital role that vans play in our economy”.

via BBC NEWS | England | West Midlands | UK orders ‘white van man’ study.

Now this may come as a shock to the Government, so perhaps the transport minister should be sitting as he reads this: People order things, food, goods, books… you name it they order it. This is then made and sent to the shops and warehouses where people buy them.

Now the fairies and the pigeons are not delivering it, its every day men and women in white vans. So please don’t be shocked when you see a lot of them on the road they are just doing their job of getting your products from the manufacturer to the shop, to your doorstep.

I have saved the EU a heap of money. Areas to be studied include how the market is regulated, now that should prove interesting as transport has a whole raft of red tape. It’s unlikely anyone anytime soon will be looking at making life easier for white van men and women.

Hope the money for this study isn’t coming from our taxes.

Kevin

Become an owner driver and participate in this study ;-)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

, , , , ,

No Comments

In an accident, who can be a witness?

Chris Lodge provides the informative answer -

Effectively anyone who saw the accident or was involved can give witness evidence.

Consequently, if you are the driver but not the owner of the vehicle damaged in an accident you will be the Claimants (or Defendants) main witness.

Independent Witnesses

The best witness is someone completely independent of either driver and preferably not a passenger in any of the vehicle involved.  However, a fare paying passenger in a taxi or bus may be regarded as independent if he or she did not know the driver before the journey was commenced.

Other motorists whose vehicle were not involved are good independent witnesses if they actually saw the accident rather than just the aftermath of it.

Where there has been a three (or more) car shunt“ see Rear End Shunts “ the driver of Car One may witness how many impacts were felt.

Non-independent witnesses

Passengers in a vehicle can give evidence at trial as they are competent and compellable but their evidence will carry less weight than a witness who is fully independent.

If however, the passenger is injured and liability is disputed, then the driver of their vehicle is potentially a party in any action they may bring. Consequently, they cannot give witness evidence until their claim has been settled or an agreement reached as who pays their claim (nor can they be represented by the same solicitor as the driver).

Witnesses who did not actually see the accident

Sometimes, a witnesses may arrive upon the scene seconds after the accident or have heard the impact rather than seen it or can comment on the reckless driving or speed of the negligent driver immediately before the accident took place.

Their evidence may be of more limited value but nevertheless they can give evidence if desired.

Whose witness?

Whilst a witness may be called by any driver involved, there is no property in a witness which means that he or she  can contacted and compelled to give evidence by either party “ and this can apply to passengers in the opponents vehicle.

Police reports

In more serious accidents, the Police may have taken statements from witnesses and there may be statements from the officers attending. However, one should be wary of reying on any comments attributed in the police report to either party or any independent witness unless part of a Witness Statement actually signed by that person.

Expert witnesses

An expert witness is a person who did not witness the accident but has been asked in a professional capacity to give evidence.

Thus an independent GP or consultant may be the medical expert or a consulting engineer may be called upon to provide evidence of the value of the vehicle.

Whilst they may have been instructed by one of the parties, they owe a duty to the Court not to the person responsible for paying their fees.

Chris is a Road Traffic Accident solicitor for Kaslers in Kent.

Chris Lodge
Kaslers Solicitors
If you need After Accident Assistance following a Road Accident in the UK, we can help – <a href=”mailto:cml@kaslers.co.uk?subject=”Ref: Kevin Arrow”>Email direct with as much info as you can by clicking here</a>

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

, , , , ,

No Comments

Vehicle accidents caused by animals…

Article by Chris Lodge from Kaslers. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Accidents caused by animals

A claim is regarded as a fault claim if the Claimant’s insurers cannot recover the amount they have paid in repairs or a total loss from any other person.

Consequently if a wild animal like a fox causes an accident by running out into the road, there is nobody against whom a claim can be brought, so the claim will be treated as a fault accident even though the driver was not negligent.

However, where a pet such as a dog or horse is the cause, the pet owner may be liable IF he has been negligent in allowing the animal to behave in such a way as to cause the accident.

Having said that if the negligent owner has neither pet insurance nor a house contents policy which covers damage caused by pets, it is normally very hard to recover whatever compensation is awarded.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

, , , ,

No Comments

More #followfridays that are essential to those that drive for a living

With inspiration from @nikkipilkington, we tried this a few weeks ago and guess what we are doing it again this week!

So some more of our #FollowFriday recommendations are:-

@babssaul blogmistress and uber girl geek, Babs is a good friend and  good to follow and chat with, especially if you are in Kent
@elocio plays interesting and often apt music choices, if you like to hear music in your tweets, he’s a good follow

@directassist VA to the stars, puts your blogs in places you could never imagine, or so I am told ;-)

@BTTradespace, if you don’t have a Tradespace sending your blogs to twitter then you are missing out, Amy and the Team behind Tradespace help promote many of their members and their members projects – so you will find something special amongst these tweets.

@caraccidentadvice and @fleetrisk two essential follows for those in the transport industry.

So, who are you recommending to follow on twitter this Friday? Who are the other transport essentials on twitter?

Regards

Kevin aka @Freight_rescue

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Related Posts with Thumbnails

, , , , ,

No Comments